RE: dlsw direct encapsulation

From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Sat Jul 24 2004 - 11:08:20 GMT-3


Lord, I could never have it worked over frame relay subinterfaces nor could
I find any doc about it. I also sent e-mails to the list but in vane,

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Lord, Chris [mailto:chris.lord@lorien.co.uk]
Sent: sabado, 24 de julio de 2004 15:58
To: Joseph D. Phillips; group study
Subject: RE: dlsw direct encapsulation

Please can you explain what it is that's wrong with the frame map dlsw? Or,
are you suggesting it isn't required at all?

Thx,
C

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph D. Phillips [mailto:josephdphillips@fastmail.us]
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 2:54 PM
To: Lord, Chris; group study
Subject: Re: dlsw direct encapsulation

Your frame map is wrong, I think.

I thought you used frame map dlsw for the older version.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:34:13 +0100, "Lord, Chris" <chris.lord@lorien.co.uk>
said:
> Hi people, I've been struggling with this one for hours now, please
> can somone put me out of my misery??
>
> If I configure dlsw+ direct encapsulation between two routers both
> using physical interfaces everything works ok. If I then change one
> end to use a frame-relay sub-interface I can't get it to work.
>
> This works......
>
> R1:
>
> bridge 1 proto ieee
> dlsw local peer 20.1.1.1
> dlsw remote 0 frame int s0/0 102 pass-thru
> dlsw bridge 1
>
> int e0
> bridge-group 1
>
> s0/0
> encaps frame
> no frame inv
> ip add 20.1.12.1 255.255.255.0
> frame map ip 20.1.12.1 102
> frame map ip 20.1.12.2 102 broad
> frame map dlsw 102 broad
>
> R2:
>
> bridge 1 proto ieee
> dlsw local peer 20.1.2.2
> dlsw remote 0 frame int s0/0 201 pass-thru
> dlsw bridge 1
>
> int e0
> bridge-group 1
>
> s0/0
> encaps frame
> no frame inv
> ip add 20.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
> frame map ip 20.1.12.2 201
> frame map ip 20.1.12.1 201 broad
> frame map dlsw 201 broad
>
> IF I THEN CHANGE R2 TO THE FOLLOWING, PEERING WILL NOT COME UP......
>
> R2:
>
> bridge 1 proto ieee
> dlsw local peer 20.1.2.2
> dlsw remote 0 frame int s0/0.12 201 pass-thru
> dlsw bridge 1
>
> int e0
> bridge-group 1
>
> s0/0
> encaps frame
> no frame inv
> s0/0.12
> ip add 20.1.12.2 255.255.255.0
> frame map ip 20.1.12.2 201
> frame map ip 20.1.12.1 201 broad
> frame map dlsw 201 broad
>
> Any ideas or advice would be much appreciated.
>
> Chris.
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> The information contained in this email is confidential and is
> intended for the recipient only. If you have received it in error,
> please notify us immediately by reply email and then delete it from
> your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
> disclose its contents to any other person or store or copy this
> information in any medium. The views contained in this email are those
> of the author and not necessarily those of Lorien plc.
>
> Thank you for your co-operation.
> **********************************************************************
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 10:12:02 GMT-3