From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 07:53:59 GMT-3
Maybe, I just don't know for sure. I was under the impression that portfast
should only be used on ports that connect to end stations. So, I want to
confirm or debunk this impression.
Have you ever used portfast with router on a stick or in any other situation
where the port wasn't connected to an end station? What happened?
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lord, Chris" <chris.lord@lorien.co.uk>
To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>; "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: spanning-tree portfast trunk
... how about a router-on-a stick running ISL or .1q trunking between it and
the switch?
Cheers,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:20 AM
To: Group Study
Subject: spanning-tree portfast trunk
Hi guys,
Is the only time the "trunk" option can be used correctly on above command
is
when port is connected to an IP Phone?
Also, if an IP Phone is connected to a port, and span portfast is configured
without the trunk option, will that cause a problem or generate an error
message?
Thanks, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:36 GMT-3