From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 29 2004 - 15:48:38 GMT-3
I think the new R/S lab book is great, if not for the scenarios for the
proctor hints. It did go over a few things I've never seen (nor thought
about before). I wouldnt say this book is a stand-out as far as technology
but it's most useful for learning "how" to think on the lab. The editing in
the new book leaves a bit to be desired :)
Josh Lauer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Dumoulin" <Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr>
To: "john matijevic" <matijevi@bellsouth.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 1:39 PM
Subject: RE : RE : Cisco Press Routing and Switchling Lab book
> Thank you for the offer John.
>
> As for the book, it is very good yes. But I have only made one scenario
(not
> even finished) and have found several errors.
> See for example in page 384 when he wants EIGRP to filter the network
> 50.5.5.0/24. The author uses access-list 50.5.5.0 0.0.0.255 when it is
more
> correct to use 50.5.5.0 0.0.0.0.
>
> On the question regarding eigrp bandwidth, the questions asks for a
"minimum
> bandwidth". The command "ip bandwidth-percent eigrp 70" reserves a maximum
> bandwidth which means another solution would be " ip bandwidth-percent
eigrp
> 100".
>
> In page 382, he says "we need ... network 160.10.0.0" when it is
absolutely
> not needed at all ! The redistribution will do the work,
>
> I a thinking it might be a good idea that I suscribe in your forum to
> discuss this ...
>
> --Richard
>
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : john matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
> Envoyi : Sunday, August 29, 2004 7:26 PM
> @ : Richard Dumoulin; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Objet : RE: RE : Cisco Press Routing and Switchling Lab book
>
> Hello Richard,
> I have configured with and without the broadcast keyword as you have
> mentioned. I really have not noticed a difference. One could argue that
> it uses unnecessary bandwidth in the real world. However, there are
> many lab vendor books that due use the broadcast keyword. The point
> being is that this book has so many valuable tools and lessons learned.
> I think by going through the labs and going through the entire book, you
> will find that it is of the highest quality. There are other minor
> errors with the book, I was just making overall assessment when I posted
> this email. Again, I really love this book. I think it is the best
> resource available, and if you need rack time I am offering my rack and
> forum area for support.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Matijevic, CCIE #13254, MCSE, CNE, CCEA
> CEO
> IgorTek Inc.
> 151 Crandon Blvd. #402
> Key Biscayne, FL 33149
> Hablo Espanol
> 305-321-6232
> http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-CCIE
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Richard Dumoulin
> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 5:52 AM
> To: john matijevic; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE : Cisco Press Routing and Switchling Lab book
>
> One thing I have noticed is that the author configure "broadcast" in the
> frame-relay map's between spokes in a frame-relay hub and spoke
> scenario.
> I am not sure this is good practice and we all know that broadcasts are
> not
> forwarded by the hub and it therefore does not make sense,
>
> --Richard
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
> necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If
> you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
> delivering it to the intended recipient, be advised that you have
> received this email in error and that any dissemination, distribution,
> copying or use is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with
> the content of this email please e-mail to:
> e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software
> viruses which could damage your own computer system. While the sender
> has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot
> accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of
> software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before
> opening any attachments to this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 03 2004 - 07:02:49 GMT-3