From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@huapi.ba.ar)
Date: Thu Sep 09 2004 - 06:50:46 GMT-3
Hmm, passive interface ?
Also, why you use a permit 0.0.0.0/32 ?
I guess it's more obvious to use a deny 0.0.0.0/0 le 32
Edi Guntoro wrote:
> Hi CCCIE and CCIE
>
> If I asked to filter any route from going to upstream router, and there
> is no other restriction, which one is better ? distribute-list with acl
> or with prefix-list? Both of these below config produce the same result.
> Any comment will be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> edi
>
> option 1
> router rip
> version 2
> network 10.0.0.0
> network 11.0.0.0
> network 12.0.0.0
> network 192.10.1.0
> distribute-list 6 out FastEthernet0/1
> no auto-summary
> !
> access-list 6 deny any
> !
>
> option 2
> router rip
> version 2
> network 10.0.0.0
> network 11.0.0.0
> network 12.0.0.0
> network 192.10.1.0
> distribute-list prefix all out FastEthernet0/1
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip prefix-list all seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/32
> !
> distribute-list prefix all out FastEthernet0/1
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:40 GMT-3