From: joshua lauer (jslauer@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 18 2004 - 08:56:02 GMT-3
I would do it, you isolated your network by bringing down the link correct?
I have the book but I have not looked at this lab yet but I'm "assuming" :)
that all interfaces have to be reachable correct? If that statement is
correct they would have to be reachable 100 percent of the time. I think a
virtual link would satisfy the requirement but again......I have not looked
at the other lab requirements. You cant get docked for overconfiguration I
dont think, unless it breaks something.
josh
Josh Lauer
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Rothstein" <ziutek@mac.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:28 AM
Subject: Lab 3 Cisco Press backup solution
> The solution for this lab uses back interface on the serial interface of
> R4. I have no problem getting this to work, my problem is that if this
> interface goes down, the lower half of the network is isolated, despite
> the existence of Area 2, and a connection to R6. Because R6 no longer has
> a connection to Area 0, OSPF is broken. The solution is pretty straight
> forward, putting a VL between R1 and R6 over Area 2. My question however
> is more a matter of what is said, and left unsaid on the exam. I know that
> when we assume we often make an ass(of)u(and)me, but should we assume that
> the backup solution should include this virtual-link as well? There are
> notspecific requirements for this in the task, but are the reachability
> requirements assumed here?
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 15:00:45 GMT-3