From: steve.skinner@uk.pwc.com
Date: Thu Oct 07 2004 - 06:23:55 GMT-3
thanks to everyone ...
i know my next (3rd attempt) is over a month away ....but that just freaked
me out after a long day
Agreed the bok is REALLY Cool ...
Cheers
Stephen Skinner
Senior Network Analyst
PricewaterHouse Coopers LLP
Tel +44 02075834182
Fax +44 02078048235
<richardd@mi.madrit
el.es> To: "none" <alsontra@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent by: cc:
nobody@groupstudy.c Subject: Re: Disallowing Callout
om
06/10/2004 19:25
Please respond to
richardd
Always put a dialer-group on the isdn interface even if its to deny all ip
traffic. Options 2 and 3 would be fine although I would prefer the second
one.
>
> De: "none" <alsontra@hotmail.com>
> Fecha: 2004/10/06 mii AM 06:01:38 GMT+02:00
> Para: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Asunto: Disallowing Callout
>
> In various ISDN scenarios you are sometimes asked to disallow one side
from
> call the other. There a several ways of accomplishing this, but I'm
> wondering if there is any functional difference between the following:
>
> 1. Removing the dialer-group from the ISDN interface
>
> 2. Removing the dialer string from the dialer map
>
> 3. Using only deny statements in your dialer-list ACL
>
> Is there a reason to prefer one over the others or this situational?
>
> Thanks
> Alsontra
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 17:11:44 GMT-3