From: Erick Bergquist (ebergquist@ameritech.net)
Date: Sat Jan 01 2005 - 21:56:40 GMT-3
FREEK is good on PVCs that you're backing up in some
fashion (ISDN, etc). When the PVC fails FREEK fails
and brings interface down causing the backup method to
kick in. Without FREEK, sometimes the PVC can show up
and not be passing traffic thus the backup doesn't
kick in.
--- Ling Yi <lingyi10@gmail.com> wrote:
> May I just add that LMI is only local significant
> and FREEK (love that
> term too!) is
> regarding the whole PVC. Sometimes I've been asked
> to implement it on
> the MGX (both ends), but not often. Just wondering
> what additional
> info does the router grabs when having FREEK? And
> why customer wants
> it? I think most of time its on an ABRFST
> (available-bit-rate with
> foresight capability) PVCs, is it just additional
> feature of
> congestion avoidance? btw, I just joined not long
> ago; just want to
> thank Scott for all the comments, I have learnt a
> lot from it.
>
>
> On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:54:11 -0500, Scott Morris
> <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> > Completely different...
> >
> > Keepalive is your serial timers. This is used
> with LMI for your
> > conversation with the FR switch. FREEK (I always
> loved that acronym) on the
> > other hand is an intra-PVC thing between two end
> nodes and has nothing to do
> > with LMI at all.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, MCSE, CCDP, CCIE4
> (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
> > #4713, JNCIP, CCNA-WAN Switching, CCSP, Cable
> Communications Specialist, IP
> > Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design
> Specialist, CISSP
> > CCSI #21903
> > swm@emanon.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Drew
> > Whitaker
> > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 2:35 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: LMI Timers
> >
> > When configuring LMI timers, what is the
> difference between the 'keepalive
> > #' command and the frame-relay end-to-end
> keepalive timer {send | receive|
> > count' command? Do they accomplish the same
> thing?
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 02 2005 - 22:10:18 GMT-3