From: Balaji Siva (bsivasub@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Feb 10 2005 - 14:05:32 GMT-3
Tim,
I don't think all of the documentation is good or extremely poor either.
If you think some section or topic is not adequate covered, use the
feedback option available on top of the page and let the documentation
guys know. If it is valid, I am sure they would review it and makes
changes if possible.
I have first hand knowledge of the feedback being addressed for the
tech tips but doc-cd I would think it would be similar.
Thanks
Balaji
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:56:05 -0800, Jim Devane <jim@powerpulse.cc> wrote:
> Absolutely.
>
> There are a lot of companies out there that truly have poor documentation if
> it exists at all. Cisco is not one of them.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Richard Dumoulin
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:48 AM
> To: ccie2be; Group Study
> Subject: RE: Quality of Cisco Documentation
>
> DOC CD is my best friend and is free! Also in my humble opinion, Cisco is
> the best documented OS in the world! What more do you need :)
>
> -- Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:34 PM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: Quality of Cisco Documentation
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm just wondering how many people think like I do that Cisco Documentation
> is
> extremely poor
>
> especially what's included on the Doc-CD?
>
> Aside from complaining about how terrible it is, do you think there's
> anything
> that can be done that would make Cisco vastly improve the quality of it's
>
> documentation?
>
> Personally, I think Cisco should demand the same level of quality from it's
> documentation as it does for potential ccie's.
>
> Can you imagine how good the documentation would be if the quality of the
> documentation had to be as high as the skills
>
> needed to pass the ccie lab?
>
> What's your opinion?
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> **********************************************************************
> Any opinions expressed in the email are those of the individual and not
> necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are
> not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to
> the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in
> error and that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with the
> content of this email please e-mail to: e-security.support@vanco.info
>
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
> which could damage your own computer system. While the sender has taken
> every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept
> liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses.
> You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachments to
> this e-mail.
> **********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 03 2005 - 08:51:19 GMT-3