RE: RE: VoIP

From: Joe Smith (j333smith@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 19 2005 - 19:28:04 GMT-3


Scott,

I didn't find the random source ports in the range of 11000-11999 for DLSW
only a random source port that was not 2065 or 2067. I know H.245 uses
ports 11000-11999.

RfC 2166:
6.2.1.1 TCP Port Numbers

   DLSws implementing these enhancements will use a TCP destination port
   of 2067 (as opposed to RFC 1795 which uses 2065) for single session
   TCP connections. The source port will be a random port number using
   the established TCP norms which exclude the possibility of either
   2065 or 2067.

Joe

>From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>Reply-To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
>To: <mcodina@nwncable.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: RE: VoIP
>Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:53:32 -0500
>
>Actually that's the original method (RFC 1789 if memory serves). RFC 2166
>changed things.
>
>Source is random port between 11000-11999 and destination is 2065.
>
>HTH,
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>mcodina@nwncable.com
>Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 1:15 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: RE: VoIP
>
>I agree, and besides that, you need to know the protocols processes very
>well in order to filter. For example DLSw+ traffic needs to be filtered
>both
>from the 2065 port and to the 2065 port. That's why I asked for a good
>source on Traffic Filtering, looking for details.
>
>Mauricio
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 03 2005 - 17:56:48 GMT-3