From: simon hart (simon.hart@btinternet.com)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 14:36:44 GMT-3
Hi Tim,
The configuration is different for each end, effectively one end calls the
other.  This as you can see is different from PPP over F/R
So you need on the distant end (R4) the following config
interface e0/1
pppoe enable
pppoe-client dial-pool 1
Interface Dialer 1
ip address 137.1.4.4 255.255.255.0
dialer pool 1
encapsulation ppp
Also you will need encapsulation ppp on your Virtual Template on R3
HTH
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: 01 June 2005 17:23
To: Group Study
Subject: PPP over Ethernet
Hi guys,
Here's the problem:
r3 e0/1 <---------------------------------------> e0/1 R4
      ^                                                ^
      |                                                 |
  137.1.3.3/24                                    |
                                                  137.1.4.4
I assume this should work the same way as ppp over f/r which also allows 2
different ip subnets over the same physical link.  So, I figured pppoe was
the way to go but this isn't working so maybe pppoe isn't the way to do
this.  Any thoughts on this approach are welcomed.
I configured pppoe exactly as shown on the Doc-cd.
Here's the config from 1 side. The other side is the same except for ip
address:
vpdn enable
!
vpdn-group 1
 accept-dialin
  protocol pppoe
  virtual-template 1
 pppoe limit per-mac 50
interface Ethernet0/1
 no ip address
 half-duplex
 pppoe enable
interface Virtual-Template1
 mtu 1492
 ip address 137.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
sh vpdn
%No active L2TP tunnels
%No active L2F tunnels
%No active PPTP tunnels
%No active PPPoE tunnels
sh ip int brief
Ethernet0/1                unassigned      YES unset  up
up
Virtual-Access1            unassigned      YES unset  up
up
Virtual-Template1          137.1.3.3       YES manual down
down
Virtual-Access2            unassigned      YES unset  down
down
sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is not set
     137.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       137.1.37.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
I get similar output from these show commands on the other side of the link.
I also checked that both ethernet interfaces are connected to the same 3550
and in the same vlan.
Anyone have any ideas?
TIA, Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:40 GMT-3