From: Vijay Ramcharan (vramcharan@thedeal.com)
Date: Wed Jun 08 2005 - 14:17:44 GMT-3
Sorry for the spam, this question is from Lab 16 of IEWB Vol 1.
Vijay Ramcharan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Vijay Ramcharan
Sent: 08 June, 2005 12:51
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Solution used for IEWB Vol1 Q8.5
I am having doubts on the solution provided in IEWB Vol1 Q8.5
Could someone indicate why this is the appropriate solution?
The IEWB question:
Prevent Quake from being played during work hours with the limitation
that no ACL can be applied to an interface. The Quake server is on VLAN
5.
The IEWB solution:
Used a policy map that references an ACL with the appropriate time
ranges. The policy map was applied inbound on R5 E0/0.
The solution doesn't prevent anyone in Vlan5 from playing Quake whenever
they want.
Am I just wrong in thinking that the solution doesn't fit the question?
My solution was to apply a VACL to the 3550 switch that manages VLAN 5.
************
VLAN 5 - Quake server 154.1.5.100, UDP Src 27960, Users playing Quake
---------
|
|
|E0/0|
[R5]---------E0/1 VLAN 55, Users playing Quake
|S0/0|
|
|
FRAME RELAY
|
|
[S0/0]
[R3]--------E0/1 Vlan 3003, Users playing Quake
Thanks.
Vijay Ramcharan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:41 GMT-3