From: James Yeo (James.Yeo@arivia.co.za)
Date: Tue Jun 21 2005 - 08:09:21 GMT-3
Please check your version:
My policy has the following options:
Not_Nortel(config-pmap-c)#?
QoS policy-map class configuration commands:
  bandwidth        Bandwidth
  compression      Activate Compression
  drop             Drop all packets
  exit             Exit from QoS class action configuration mode
  netflow-sampler  NetFlow action
  no               Negate or set default values of a command
  police           Police
  priority         Strict Scheduling Priority for this Class
  queue-limit      Queue Max Threshold for Tail Drop
  random-detect    Enable Random Early Detection as drop policy
  service-policy   Configure Flow Next
  set              Set QoS values
  shape            Traffic Shaping
Thanks
James
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Keane, James
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:54 PM
To: ccie2be; John Matus; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: filtering active mode vs. passive mode ftp
Ok I understand how you are matching ftp using nbar .. but how are you
filtering it ?
with a service policy ?
I cant see anything in the policy map helping much
  bandwidth       Bandwidth
  exit            Exit from QoS class action configuration mode
  priority        Strict Scheduling Priority for this Class
  queue-limit     Queue Max Threshold for Tail Drop
  random-detect   Enable Random Early Detection as drop policy
  service-policy  Configure QoS Service Policy
  shape           Traffic Shaping
  police          Police
  set             Set QoS values
Care to shed some light, I suppose I am barking up the wrong tree as per
usual !
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: 20 June 2005 22:32
To: 'John Matus'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: filtering active mode vs. passive mode ftp
Hey John,
Recently (within the past 2 or 3 weeks), I went over this issue with Bob
Sinclair.
For both active and passive, you can use nbar ie match prot ftp.
If you want to use an acl for active, you can use "eq ftp" and "eq
ftp-data".
For passive FTP, you're out of luck suing an acl for the data
connection.
HTH, Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John
Matus
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 5:16 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: filtering active mode vs. passive mode ftp
i'm a bit confused how you would filter active ftp vs. passive ftp.
both 
sessions initate on the servers port 21 so i can see how you could
filter 
with w/:
access-l 100 deny tcp host 1.1.1.1 host 1.1.1.2 eq ftp
but when you get to the data part of the session it seems that you would
only be able to block active mode ftp with:
access-l 100 deny tcp host 1.1.1.1 host 1.1.1.2 eq ftp-data where the
port 
is 20.   is this correct?  is there another way to block passive mode
ftp?
i suppose you could just block port 21 in either scenarion and that
would 
stop the command portion of the session so the data would be a mute
point.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:42 GMT-3