From: George Cassels (glcassels3@nc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Jun 25 2005 - 07:30:08 GMT-3
Actually Sila I think there is a big difference, but don't have a lot of
time this AM...heading to spend my Saturday in a fun NMC lab the rest of
the day..
But if I remember right when you have multiple priority queues set up in
MQC it becomes a like fifo round robin setup where as in priority
queuing if there is data in the high queue it will always get serviced
first.
George
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sila Moni
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 11:19 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: QoS - legacy priority convert to MQC
Hi
I'm practicing QoS. I've some questions.
Are the two methods the same? If not specified, I can
assign any value to my priority right? BTW, if my
total value exceed 75%, I should use
'max-reserved-bandwidth xx' under the interface. What
if the value is less than 75%?
TIA
Sila
interface Ethernet1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
priority-group 1
!
priority-list 1 protocol ip medium tcp smtp
priority-list 1 protocol ip normal tcp telnet
priority-list 1 protocol ip low
priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp www
--------------------------------------------
interface Ethernet1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
service-policy output PRIORITY
!
ip cef
!
class-map HIGH
match protocol http
!
class-map MEDIUM
match protocol smtp
!
class-map NORMAL
match protocol telnet
!
policy-map PRIORITY
class HIGH
priority percent 40
class MEDIUM
priority percent 20
class NORMAL
priority percent 10
class class-default
police cir percent 5
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:43 GMT-3