From: Sila Moni (silamoni@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Jun 29 2005 - 10:01:59 GMT-3
From my old day of working with Bay, I recall using
encap ietf. Also when configuring ospf, I had to play
around with the timer interval as well in order for it
to work with cisco. There must be an rfc for various
open standards.
--- ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Pat,
>
> Off-hand, I don't know the answer to your f/r q. I
> believe sub's inherit
> encap from phy since you can specify encap within a
> fram map statement but
> you can verify this with a little labbing.
>
> Re: proprietary vs standard
>
> HSRP vs VRRP
>
> Tacacs vs radius
>
> Stac vs ????
>
> PagP vs Lacp
>
> cmgp vs igmp snooping
>
> There are probably lots more but these are the ones
> I could think of at the
> moment.
>
> HTH, Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Pat
> Chui
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:48 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: pretend to work with non-cisco routers
>
> All,
> When asked to work with other vendors' routers, on
> Cisco routers, Do
> you have to set frame-relay encapsulation type to
> ietf at both
> interface level and pvc level? or setting it only at
> interface level
> can take care of pvc level?
> and other than F/R encapsulation, what other area
> you can think of?
> like using 802.1q instead of isl, etc.
>
> Appreciate your feedback,
> Pat
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:45 GMT-3