nat

From: Vishal Patel (vpatel@accessproviders.com.au)
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 19:43:52 GMT-3

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "RE: Multicast"
• Previous message: DaveW: "Re: NAT Pool Limitations"
• Next in thread: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: Mike Flanagan: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: Vishal Patel: "RE: nat"
• Maybe reply: Sila Moni: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: Vishal Patel: "RE: nat"
• Maybe reply: Kirk Graham: "RE: nat"
• Maybe reply: Vishal Patel: "RE: nat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

I want to nat the out going packets and if the out going interface goes
down , then the backup interface should come up and do the natting.

I don't want to use any dynamic routing protocol.

Just two default routes for outbound packets.

I tried to lab it ..but unfortunately natting doesn't happen when the backup
interface comes up.

Any ideas.. or any good reading on this ?

Thanks

Vishal

• Next message: gladston@br.ibm.com: "RE: Multicast"
• Previous message: DaveW: "Re: NAT Pool Limitations"
• Next in thread: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: gladston@br.ibm.com: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: Mike Flanagan: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: Vishal Patel: "RE: nat"
• Maybe reply: Sila Moni: "Re: nat"
• Maybe reply: Vishal Patel: "RE: nat"
• Maybe reply: Kirk Graham: "RE: nat"
• Maybe reply: Vishal Patel: "RE: nat"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 14:43:46 GMT-3