From: cacca mucca (caccamucca@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jul 17 2005 - 14:16:27 GMT-3
Okay, question is regarding redistribution,
OSPF <-> EIGRP (no filtering required per Chris)
OSPF <-> ISIS (my guess is you need something on the ISIS side?)
OSPF <-> RIP (my guess is you need something on the RIP side?)
EIGRP <-> RIP (my guess is you need something on the RIP side?)
EIGRP <-> ISIS (my guess is you need something on the ISIS side?)
Without using extensive filtering on the subnets, how does one prevent route
feedbacks?
Thanks
>From: "Joe Rinehart" <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>
>To: "cacca mucca"
><caccamucca@hotmail.com>,<chrlewis@cisco.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: LAB study guide
>Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:00:59 -0700
>
>Can you give me the scenario? There are several ways to go about that and
>I
>would need a context....
>
>Joe Rinehart
>CCIE #14256, CCNP, CCDP
>Data Network Consultant
>AT&T Pacific Northwest Enterprise Markets
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "cacca mucca" <caccamucca@hotmail.com>
>To: <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>; <chrlewis@cisco.com>;
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 7:27 PM
>Subject: Re: LAB study guide
>
>
> > Can you provide us with an example of the "distance ospf external to
>stop
> > routes feeding back" ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >From: "Joe Rinehart" <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Joe Rinehart" <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>
> > >To: "Chris Lewis (chrlewis)" <chrlewis@cisco.com>,
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: Re: LAB study guide
> > >Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:45:08 -0700
> > >
> > >Agreed on the redistribution answers. There are several ways to answer
> > >something, especially since the real test was whether or not ot
>achieved
> > >the
> > >desired result.....
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Chris Lewis (chrlewis)" <chrlewis@cisco.com>
> > >To: "Joe Rinehart" <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 8:38 AM
> > >Subject: RE: LAB study guide
> > >
> > >
> > >My opinion, FWIW is that they both have a lot of value to offer, DoiT
> > >more for the routing scenarios, Internetworkexpert more for the
>security
> > >and services side.
> > >
> > >I would add though that I often created simpler solutions to the NMC
> > >answer keys, particularly regarding the redistribution scenarios. I
> > >found it easier to use things like distance ospf external to stop
>routes
> > >feeding back, rather than setting up lots of specific route filters.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >Joe Rinehart
> > >Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:27 AM
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: LAB study guide
> > >
> > >Well I used the DoIT lab workbook and had great results, what exactly
> > >was out in left field? The thing that drove me crazy was
> > >redistribution, DoIT would have at least three to four redistribution
> > >points on each lab and you had to be really really careful about how
>you
> > >filtered....
> > >
> > >Joe Rinehart
> > >CCIE #14256, CCNP, CCDP
> > >Data Network Consultant
> > >AT&T Pacific Northwest Enterprise Markets
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > On 7/14/05, cacca mucca <caccamucca@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I'm using the DOiT lab and it is out in the left field. I should
> > > > > have
> > >bought
> > > > > the InterNetwork Expert. I even had an upgrade coming, but went
>with
> > >DOiT.
> > > > > Kicking myself now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents
> > > > >
> > > > > >From: "Hooman Parta" <hooman@voipsol.com>
> > > > > >Reply-To: "Hooman Parta" <hooman@voipsol.com>
> > > > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > > >Subject: LAB study guide
> > > > > >Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:22:12 -0500
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I just started my LAB preparation and got my LAB already. Does
>any
> > > > > >one recommend any of the LAB preparation materials. There are
> > > > > >several
> > >compaies
> > > > > >with differnt options. NLI, IPEXPERT, IE, InterNetwork expert and
> > > > > >much more.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I know I should look for updated material which reflects the IPv6
> > > > > >and
> > >12.2T
> > > > > >but which one do you think is better to start?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Thanks,
> > > > > >Hooman Parta
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> >___________________________________________________________________
> > > > > >____ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from
> > >McAfee.
> > > > > Security.
>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> > > > >
> > > > >
>____________________________________________________________________
> > > > > ___ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > >
>______________________________________________________________________
> > > > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________________________________
> > >Subscription information may be found at:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:30 GMT-3