From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Thu Jul 28 2005 - 14:06:34 GMT-3
You could actually do it with both (policy routing or MQC).
With policy routing this could be applied only inbound with the 'ip
policy route-map' interface level command, however the MQC
service-policy could be applied inbound or outbound. Ideally though you
would want to drop traffic as you receive it, not as you go to send it,
so you don't have to waste cycles in the routing lookup and switching
process.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> James Ventre
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:09 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Nesting ACLs
>
> not a service-policy - but an ip policy applied to the interface
> (sorry - been doing a lot of QoS lately)
>
> James
>
>
>
> James Ventre wrote:
>
> > What about some type of serivce-policy applied interface that
matches
> > against the nested ACL's ... and sends all matching traffic to Null0
?
> >
> > James
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:31 GMT-3