From: Ed Tan (tytanx@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 29 2005 - 20:09:50 GMT-3
Quick question, I am just wondering how's the proctor check our final lab
config on the exam? Are they runing a script to check if your config match
with theirs or they actually manually check your config? The motivation
behind this question is if some questions which is very subject to many
possible solutions, are they accepting all of them or they will only match
one (script marking)?
TIA.
On 7/25/05, Dillon Yang <dillony@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Tim:
>
> Yes. "Some features don't accept a named acl." That is what I implied,
> since the numerical ACL works well with all the command, it is the best.
> As for "passive-interface", it really bans all the advertising update out,
> regardless of neighborhood or update in. In comparison to the other command
> such as "distribute-list", it is very simple.
>
> TIA
> dillon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
> To: "'Dillon Yang'" <dillony@gmail.com>; "'Group Study'" <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 5:40 AM
> Subject: RE: lesson from failure
>
>
> > Dillon,
> >
> > There are pro's and con's to using a named acl.
> >
> > Pro's
> > A named acl can help to document the function of the acl eg Task-5.2which
> > can help you avoid making dumb mistakes like applying an acl in the same
> > direction as another acl already on the interface which is an easy
> mistake
> > to make.
> >
> > Con's
> > Some features don't accept a named acl. However, you can still create a
> > named acl and use a number instead of an alphanumeric string which has
> the
> > benefit of allowing you to edit your acl more easily.
> >
> > Whichever method you choose, I highly recommend that you add remarks to
> your
> > acl during the lab so that you don't accidentally "overwrite" a
> previously
> > applied acl. And. prior to creating a new acl, you do a show access-list
> so
> > you can see if the potential for a problem exists.
> >
> >
> > Re: Passive interface: This command functions differently for almost
> each
> > IGP. In fact, for IS-IS, this command can be used to inject an ip subnet
> > into the IS-IS routing process. For Rip, it only prevents broadcast and
> > multicast updates from going out, not coming in. It also doesn't prevent
> > unicast updates.
> >
> > For eigrp and ospf, it stops any adjacency from forming over the
> specified
> > interfaces.
> >
> > HTH, Tim
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Dillon Yang
> > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 11:58 AM
> > To: Group Study
> > Subject: lesson from failure
> >
> > 1. If ACL, use numerical ACL as possible.
> > 2. If advertise update, use passive-interface as possible.
> >
> > HTH
> > dillon
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:00:32 GMT-3