From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Fri Sep 23 2005 - 17:49:47 GMT-3
Rarely, if ever, would you place the backup interface command on the
physical interface when using subinterfaces.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Private Ryan
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 12:22 PM
To: charlie@hanaro.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Backup interface command under frame relay subinterface?
I think it should be placed in physical interface as backup command
will keep checking for the physical down status on the interface.
Correct me if I say something wrong.
Ryan
2005/9/24, charlie@hanaro.com <charlie@hanaro.com>:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> R1#sh run int s 0/0
>
>
> no ip addr
>
>
> encap frame-relay
>
>
> no frame-relay inv
>
>
>
>
>
> R1#sh run int s 0/0.1 multipoint
>
>
> ip addr 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
>
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.2 102 broad
>
>
> frame-relay map ip 10.1.1.3 103 broad
>
>
> no frame-relay inv
>
>
> ========================
>
>
> If I need to apply "backup interface bri 0/0" command for isdn
backup,
>
>
>
> which one is better place? int s 0/0 ? or int
s 0/0.1
> ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 14:40:16 GMT-3