From: Jian Gu (guxiaojian@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 12 2005 - 03:07:29 GMT-3
Supposely transit routers in between the two sites do not support IPv6, IPv6
packets have to be placed inside whatever transport protocol (ipv4, gre,
mpls). I don't think the requirement is achieveable.
On 10/11/05, The Great Ryan <pv.ryan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Thanks.
>
> If I need to connect two IPv6 site, running RIPng, with Tunnel but it
> is not allowed to place IPv6 within the Tunnel, which tunnel can
> fulfill that ?
>
> Ryan
>
>
> 2005/10/12, Edwards, Andrew M <andrew.m.edwards@boeing.com>:
> > No. Static routes or mBGP between local tunnel peers would work though.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The Great Ryan [mailto:pv.ryan@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:14 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: RIP in IPv6 auto-tunnel
> >
> >
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I enable auto-tunnel between R1 and R2. I can also ping the remote IPv6
> > using ::X.X.X.X from local end.
> >
> > -R1(e1)-----(e2)R2---
> >
> > However, when I add RIPng between R1 and R2, it can't see the network
> > behind R1 or R2. Can RIPng be run inside auto-tunnel ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Ryan
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:50 GMT-3