Re: Re: Summarization confusion ..

From: The Great Ryan (pv.ryan@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Oct 22 2005 - 21:49:14 GMT-3


I think your prefix-list example can be implemented by standard ACL

access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0

let change a little bit on your prefix-list example.

 ip prefix-list 10 permit 10.0.0.0/8 ge 16 le 20

Thanks !
Ryan

2005/10/23, Jian Gu <guxiaojian@gmail.com>:
> access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
>
> is equivalent to
>
> ip prefix-list 10 permit 10.0.0.0/8 le 32
>
>
> On 10/22/05, The Great Ryan <pv.ryan@gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > HI,
> >
> > can you show how to use extended ACL to match both mask and prefix ? I
> > heard that it can do that and don't know how to do that. thanks!
> >
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > 2005/10/23, jnkmail4eva@yahoo.com <jnkmail4eva@yahoo.com >:
> > > Sounds good.
> > > I am surprised it wouldn't work .
> > > I will have to test it out in my lab now ..
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:52 GMT-3