From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sun Oct 30 2005 - 20:26:42 GMT-3
Agreed. I had heard this same thing from one of the proctors...expect more
core technologies, not necessarily more IPv6.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
To: Victor Cappuccio
Cc: Bajo; Chula Bandara; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 10/30/2005 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: ipv6
In talking with the proctor before the lab, we inquired about the
changes
coming in January. He said to expect other features to be added (IOS
features in 12.3/4, etc.. to make up the lost points) and that they
wouldn't
necessarily beef up IPv6 past where it is today because they don't see
the demand for it.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Victor Cappuccio wrote:
> That Fair Game Stuff Sounds Great, so they could have something to
make you
> think a while, and know where to find stuff in the Doc CD. But what
about
> today's Lab what's the likelihood you get questions outside the
blueprint.
> (not next year Lab?)
>
> Nice Question Chula!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bajo" <bajoalex@gmail.com>
> To: "Chula Bandara" <chula_bandara@hotmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:06 PM
> Subject: Re: ipv6
>
>
> > Hi Chula,
> > Without breaking NDA and given ISDN, ATM, etc are removed, you
should
> > expect more of IPv6. Anything is a fair game.
> >
> > On 10/28/05, Chula Bandara <chula_bandara@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all i am going through the archives for couple of weeks now. i
have
> > > seen
> > > IPv6 QOS , IPv6 NAT-PT
> > > questions being discussed.
> > >
> > > I see IPV6 only under IGP and BGP sections of the R&S blueprint. (
not
> > > under
> > > QOS or IP IOS features)
> > > whats the likelyhood you get questions outside the blueprint.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Nov 06 2005 - 22:00:55 GMT-3