From: John Matus (jmatus@pacbell.net)
Date: Sat Nov 12 2005 - 01:03:56 GMT-3
dave,
i use the omission of the dialer-group because i have never been able to
keep layer-2 up by removing the dialer-string from the router i wanted to
prevent from dialing. if i remove the dialer-string then i could not ping
from the other side to bring the link up, but as soon as i put the string
back then layer 2 comes back up.......
Regards,
John D. Matus
MCSE, CCNP
Office: 818-782-2061
Cell: 818-430-8372
jmatus@pacbell.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com>
To: "John Matus " <John.Matus@tokiom.com>; <nobody@groupstudy.com>;
"Montiean " <noktes@bellsouth.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: dialer-group under BRI interface
> John -
>
> I have never heard of your last statement.....by make all traffic
> uninteresting. Weren't we just trying to keep one side from dialing,
> which
> should be taken care of with removing the dialer string/map statements?
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> To: Montiean
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 11/11/2005 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: dialer-group under BRI interface
>
> monty,
> in IE's manual they state that you can prevent a router from dialing by
> leaving off the dialer string at the end of the dialer-map statement.
> however, whenever i did this i was not able to ping from on side to the
> other.....i could only get layer 2 to come up if there was the
> dialer-string on both sides. t
> the easiest way to prevent a router from dialing isdn is to make all
> traffic uninteresting by not defining a dialer-group. very simple, very
> effective.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John D. Matus
> Technical Support / PAS
> Fujitsu Consulting
> 626-568-7716
> John.Matus@tokiom.com
>
>
>
>
> "Montiean"
>
> <noktes@bellsouth
>
> .net>
> To
> Sent by: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
> nobody@groupstudy
> cc
> .com
>
>
> Subject
> dialer-group under BRI interface
>
> 11/11/2005 09:49
>
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
> Please respond to
>
> "Montiean"
>
> <noktes@bellsouth
>
> .net>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Folks,
> Let say the question asking only one side to initiate the call so on
> other site will just configure "dialer map" without remote isdn calling
> number. This would be enough not to let the router call out.
> However, in some solution guide from lab workbook use additional
> command
>
> like " dialer-group" on the side that doesnot need to initiate the call.
> As
>
> I know, dialer-group will use to screen the traffic to initiate the
> call. I
>
> am not sure why we still need it as above scenario.
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Montiean
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 01 2005 - 09:12:06 GMT-3