From: Leigh Harrison (ccileigh@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 08 2005 - 09:43:52 GMT-3
Just to throw in my 2 cents,
I tend to use BSR rather than auto RP when fiddling with sparde mode.....
LH
John Matus wrote:
>ok, i see what you are saying.............so if a question was throw out
>that said "use auto-rp for all groups that are not link-local...." or
>something to that extent, you could do this.....
>
>
>Regards,
>
>John D. Matus
>Technical Support / PAS
>Fujitsu Consulting
>626-568-7716
>John.Matus@tokiom.com
>
>
>                                                                           
>             "Brian McGahan"                                               
>             <bmcgahan@interne                                             
>             tworkexpert.com>                                           To 
>             Sent by:                  "John Matus"                        
>             nobody@groupstudy         <John.Matus@tokiom.com>             
>             .com                                                       cc 
>                                       <ccielab@groupstudy.com>            
>                                                                   Subject 
>             12/07/2005 05:40          RE: another dumb multicast question 
>             PM                                                            
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>             Please respond to                                             
>              "Brian McGahan"                                              
>             <bmcgahan@interne                                             
>             tworkexpert.com>                                              
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>             No I'm saying to use that config in conjunction with auto-rp.
>All your groups are auto-rp assigned with the exception of the
>candidate-rp and mapping agent groups, which are statically assigned.
>
>
>HTH,
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: John Matus [mailto:John.Matus@tokiom.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 7:36 PM
>>To: Brian McGahan
>>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: RE: another dumb multicast question
>>
>>ok, i see what you are saying...............i should have said that i
>>    
>>
>was
>  
>
>>thinking in terms of auto-rp, not static rp's.......... yes, i know
>>    
>>
>you
>  
>
>>can
>>configure static rp to point to clients to the rp locations, but if
>>    
>>
>you
>  
>
>>can
>>only use auto-rp, or bootstrap, i was thinking you had some magical
>>    
>>
>way to
>  
>
>>define those groups that i was not aware of...  :)  thanks dude!
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>John D. Matus
>>Technical Support / PAS
>>Fujitsu Consulting
>>626-568-7716
>>John.Matus@tokiom.com
>>
>>
>>
>>             "Brian McGahan"
>>             <bmcgahan@interne
>>             tworkexpert.com>
>>    
>>
>To
>  
>
>>                                       "John Matus"
>>             12/07/2005 05:33          <John.Matus@tokiom.com>
>>             PM
>>    
>>
>cc
>  
>
>>                                       <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>
>>    
>>
>Subject
>  
>
>>                                       RE: another dumb multicast
>>    
>>
>question
>  
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>ok, so .39 and .40 only run in dense mode....
>>>so even tho you configure an interface in sparse mode, the global
>>>      
>>>
>>command
>>    
>>
>>>"forces" the interface to run in dense mode for .39 and .40 only <?>
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes.  You can see this in the "show ip mroute" output.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>this begs the question............how would you configure this???  i
>>>      
>>>
>>don't
>>    
>>
>>>have a router in front of me so i'm thinking perhaps an "ip igmp"
>>>      
>>>
>>command
>>    
>>
>>>of some-sort or else some kind for a static mroute perhaps???
>>>      
>>>
>>ip pim rp-address 1.2.3.4 1
>>!
>>access-list 1 permit 224.0.1.39
>>access-list 1 permit 224.0.1.40
>>
>>             This is covered in the multicast sections of IEWB-RS 3.0,
>>    
>>
>and
>  
>
>>I
>>think the 2.0 version as well.
>>
>>HTH,
>>
>>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>>
>>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: John Matus [mailto:John.Matus@tokiom.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 7:04 PM
>>>To: Brian McGahan
>>>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>Subject: RE: another dumb multicast question
>>>
>>>ok, so .39 and .40 only run in dense mode....
>>>so even tho you configure an interface in sparse mode, the global
>>>      
>>>
>>command
>>    
>>
>>>"forces" the interface to run in dense mode for .39 and .40 only <?>
>>>
>>>
>>><You can also run
>>>sparse mode only without auto-rp listener if you statically define
>>>      
>>>
>an
>  
>
>>RP
>>    
>>
>>>to send joins for 224.0.1.39 and 224.0.1.40.>
>>>
>>>this begs the question............how would you configure this???  i
>>>      
>>>
>>don't
>>    
>>
>>>have a router in front of me so i'm thinking perhaps an "ip igmp"
>>>      
>>>
>>command
>>    
>>
>>>of some-sort or else some kind for a static mroute perhaps???
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>John D. Matus
>>>Technical Support / PAS
>>>Fujitsu Consulting
>>>626-568-7716
>>>John.Matus@tokiom.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             "Brian McGahan"
>>>             <bmcgahan@interne
>>>             tworkexpert.com>
>>>      
>>>
>>To
>>    
>>
>>>                                       "John Matus"
>>>             12/07/2005 04:57          <John.Matus@tokiom.com>,
>>>             PM                        <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>cc
>>    
>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Subject
>>    
>>
>>>                                       RE: another dumb multicast
>>>      
>>>
>>question
>>    
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             It does run in dense mode, that's what auto-rp listener
>>>accomplishes.  Auto-RP listener is essentially sparse-dense mode,
>>>      
>>>
>but
>  
>
>>>you're only dense for 224.0.1.39 and 224.0.1.40.  You can also run
>>>sparse mode only without auto-rp listener if you statically define
>>>      
>>>
>an
>  
>
>>RP
>>    
>>
>>>to send joins for 224.0.1.39 and 224.0.1.40.
>>>
>>>
>>>HTH,
>>>
>>>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>>>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>>>
>>>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>>>Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
>>>Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
>>>24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
>>>Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>>>      
>>>
>>Of
>>    
>>
>>>John Matus
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 6:39 PM
>>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>Subject: another dumb multicast question
>>>
>>>just trying to get my information correct.
>>>
>>>let's say you are running auto-rp and you have mapping agents that
>>>      
>>>
>are
>  
>
>>>not
>>>directly connected to the c-rp...........and you're running in
>>>      
>>>
>sparse
>  
>
>>>mode.
>>>will "ip pim auto-rp-listener overcome the issue for the mapping
>>>      
>>>
>agent
>  
>
>>>like
>>>it does for a client/router, or does 224.0.1.39 have to run in
>>>dense-mode
>>>only?
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>John D. Matus
>>>Technical Support / PAS
>>>Fujitsu Consulting
>>>626-568-7716
>>>John.Matus@tokiom.com
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>========================================================================
>  
>
>>>================================
>>>   This  e-mail  is  intended  solely  for  the  individual  to
>>>      
>>>
>whom
>  
>
>>it
>>    
>>
>>>is
>>>addressed.   The   information  contained  in  this  transmission
>>>contains
>>>confidential  and/or proprietary information or is otherwise
>>>      
>>>
>>privileged.
>>    
>>
>>>If
>>>the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please be
>>>advised
>>>that  any  dissemination,  distribution  or copying of this
>>>      
>>>
>>transmission
>>    
>>
>>>is
>>>strictly  prohibited.  If  you  have  received this e-mail in error,
>>>please
>>>notify  us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting
>>>      
>>>
>this
>  
>
>>>copy
>>>from     your     system.     Thank     you     for    your
>>>cooperation.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>========================================================================
>  
>
>>>================================
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>  
>
>>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>      
>>>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:50 GMT-3