From: Chula Bandara (chula_bandara@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 30 2005 - 13:06:16 GMT-3
I think they are asking for the new feature,
ip ospf 1 area 0 under the relavant interfaces.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mike Ollington <mike.ollington@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Mike Ollington <mike.ollington@gmail.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IEWB v3 vol1 Lab 16 4.1 - OSPF Network Statement
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:50:45 +0000
Hello,
Requirements are that you are to enable Area 0 on the following 3
interfaces
with the minimum amount of network statements ensuring that Area 0
isn't
enabled on one of the other interfaces.
Area 0 Interfaces:
154.1.3.3/24
154.1.13.3/24
154.1.23.3/24
Non Area 0 ints:
154.1.0.3/24
154.1.38.3/24
I didn't appreciate when I started calculating wildcard masks that
OSPF
network statements appear to be inverse masks rather than
wildcards. This
network 154.1.3.0 0.0.30.255 area 0 throws an error: OSPF: Invalid
address/mask combination (discontiguous mask).
Not sure if I'm being blind but I can't see how to concatenate these
into
two or one statements without touching the 154.1.0.3 interface.
Appreciate any tips.
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jan 09 2006 - 07:07:52 GMT-3