From: lim es (tiga72@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Jan 19 2006 - 13:08:14 GMT-3
Thanks Scott, its a lab scenario actually got it
working by configuring a tunnel across(a tip from Lin,
'easyman') , since virt link is not allowed
Lim
--- Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> 1. Everyone in an area must agree on the stub flag
> in the updates, and
> everyone must agree on the database. So yes,
> configure nssa on everyone.
>
> 2. Virtual links are necessary to make that happen.
> Virtual links are not
> allowed in stub areas (although your router would
> tell you this). Are there
> any alternatives you can think of if that's a
> necessary design? (real life,
> that's a bad idea)
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of lim
> es
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:41 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ospf nssa qustion
>
> Hi Group,
>
> If i have this network
>
> r1------r2-------r3------r4
>
>
> r1 and r2: ospf area 0
>
> r2 and r3: ospf nssa, area 23
>
> r3 and r4: ripv2
>
>
> 1) do i configure "nssa" commands on both r2 and r3?
> i find that it works even when i just do it at
> r2.
> I think it is need on both r2 and r3, stub flags
> have to agree
>
> 2) if i create a area3 in r3, put a loopback
> interface
> into area 3, r2 doesnt get that route
>
> that means can i add another ospf area on the
> edge of
> nssa area, r3 ? that might be the reason why r2
> cannot
> receive the route when i do that?
>
> Appreciate any inputs
>
> Thanks
>
> Lim
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:49 GMT-3