From: fferrer10@vodafone.es
Date: Mon Feb 20 2006 - 04:32:37 GMT-3
Hi all
Thank you very much for your valuable help
Have a nice day
> > These require either an enhanced chassis
> > like 6503E - 6509E or they can fit into slots 9-13 of a 6513 chassis.
> 
> I run plenty of them in plain jane 6500s.   An E chassis is NOT a
> requirement.
> 
> >You should also run Native IOS.
> 
> Only if you plan on using dCEF.  It's not required for CFC (central
> forward).
> 
> James
> 
> David Wolsefer wrote:
> 
>   We use a lot of these blades for dense server farms. There are a few things
>   you need to know about them. You do need the Sup720, but you must also be
>   careful of the chassis as well. These require either an enhanced chassis
>   like 6503E - 6509E or they can fit into slots 9-13 of a 6513 chassis. They
>   require dual channel fabric for attachment. Single channel will not do. You
>   should also run Native IOS. You must be very careful of bug id CSCei20107. I
>   also highly recommend using the appropriate DFC for these cards that matches
>   your Sup. Here is a description of that bug, but note that you need to
>   upgrade to at least 12.2(18)SXE4. 
>   
>   The bug is CSCei20107, it impacts 6748's with DFC3's installed.  The bug is
>   essentially a memory leak related to span sessions.  If you don't have spans
>   configured you may not hit it.  The DFC's will reload due to MALLOC fail.
>   
>   Regards,
>   
>   David Wolsefer, CCIE #5858
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From:   nobody@groupstudy.com   [  mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com  ] On Behalf Of
>   Metla, Venu
>   Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:39 PM
>   To:   fferrer10@vodafone.es  ;   ccielab@groupstudy.com  Subject: RE: ws-x6748-ge-tx support
> 
>   We are using these atm. I think they require native and sup 720 
>   A word of caution is that some of these modules have a issue with them .
>   When you order make sure you receive these modules with hardware revision
>   number more than 2.3 . Otherwise they will go down into "pwr down" mode and
>   the only work around is to repalce with a new module
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From:   nobody@groupstudy.com   [  mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com  ] On Behalf Of  fferrer10@vodafone.es  Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 2:06 AM
>   To:   ccielab@groupstudy.com  Subject: OT: ws-x6748-ge-tx support
>   
>   Hi all:
>   
>   Anyone knows if Catalyst 6500 with supervisor 1A and using hybrid code can
>   support the ws-x6748-ge-tx line card?
>   
>   I've seen Cisco docs that seem contradictories... unfourtunately, i haven't
>   the apropiate hw to test this issue... it seems that if you have catos 8.1.2
>   it works but i am not totally sure.
>   
>   Anyone can help? Anyone has this type of config?
>   
>   Regards
>   
>   _______________________________________________________________________
>   Subscription information may be found at:   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html  
>   _______________________________________________________________________
>   Subscription information may be found at:   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html  
>   _______________________________________________________________________
>   Subscription information may be found at:   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html  
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:18 GMT-3