ipv6 over FR:

From: Emil Patel (emilpatel@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2006 - 15:36:17 GMT-3

• Next message: Quetta Walla: "Re: NTP Failover - server/peer - whats the difference ?"
• Previous message: DPBM@groupstudy.com: "Deep Blue Marine Sees Shares Rise"
• Next in thread: Mushtaq A. Khan: "Re: ipv6 over FR:"
• Maybe reply: Mushtaq A. Khan: "Re: ipv6 over FR:"
• Maybe reply: Emil Patel: "RE: ipv6 over FR:"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ipv6 over Frame relay is pretty straight forward and similar to ipv4. The
added complexity comes in when you run a routing protocol over frame relay
running ipv6.

As I recall from the class is that we have to resolve not only remote ipv6
to dlci but also remote link local address to dlci. Is this correct
statement?

Also if you have to resolve remote link local to dlci can we predefine link
local addresses on the interfaces running FR?

Eg:

On R2

            Int s0/0

                        Ipv6 enable

                        Ipv6 address 2001::1/64

                        Ipv6 address FE80::1 link local

So in the above case when:

On R5

            Int s0/0

            Encap frame

            No frame inv

Ipv6 address 2001::5/64

            Ipv6 address FE80::5 link local

Frame relay map ipv6 2001::1 501 br

            Frame relay map ipv6 FE80::1 501 br

Is this correct way to do it? It seems to work so just want to confirm..

Thanks

• Next message: Quetta Walla: "Re: NTP Failover - server/peer - whats the difference ?"
• Previous message: DPBM@groupstudy.com: "Deep Blue Marine Sees Shares Rise"
• Next in thread: Mushtaq A. Khan: "Re: ipv6 over FR:"
• Maybe reply: Mushtaq A. Khan: "Re: ipv6 over FR:"
• Maybe reply: Emil Patel: "RE: ipv6 over FR:"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3