Re: FW: difference between "match not" & "drop"

From: san (san.study@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2006 - 04:25:53 GMT-3

• Next message: Kemal Yildirim \(Netron\): "RE: difference between "match not" & "drop""
• Previous message: Aristomenis Zikopoulos: "FW: difference between "match not" & "drop""
• Maybe in reply to: Aristomenis Zikopoulos: "FW: difference between "match not" & "drop""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Aristomenis,

First Class Map will reject all the traffic. (Default is drop also) .
Second route map will accept all the traffic that is permitted by
access-list.

Also i have a doubt attached to same topic:
 ...below policy map.with NBAR..=> Can it be applied IN direction from
the server also ?

/SAN

On 3/23/06, Aristomenis Zikopoulos <azik@altec.gr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please, can someone tell me the difference between?
>
>
>
> --------------
>
> class-map match-all ROOT_EXPLOIT
>
> match protocol http url "*root.exe*"
>
> !
>
> policy-map BB2_IN
>
> class ROOT_EXPLOIT
>
> drop
>
> -----------------
>
> and
>
> -----------
>
> class-map match-all ROOT_EXPLOIT
>
> match no protocol http url "*root.exe*"
>
> !
>
> policy-map BB2_IN
>
> class ROOT_EXPLOIT
>
>
>
> ----------------------------
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Aris
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

• Next message: Kemal Yildirim \(Netron\): "RE: difference between "match not" & "drop""
• Previous message: Aristomenis Zikopoulos: "FW: difference between "match not" & "drop""
• Maybe in reply to: Aristomenis Zikopoulos: "FW: difference between "match not" & "drop""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3