From: Brent Foster (jbrentfoster@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 24 2006 - 17:57:38 GMT-3
Dave,
Sparse-mode SPT and Dense mode are completely
different.  SPT is not flood and prune, it uses
explicit join/prune messages to control the state of
that tree.
Dense mode always floods the tree every so often and
prunes back based on prune messages from the leaf
routers.
Therefore, I don't think the "no pim dm-fallback" will
affect sparse-mode behavior, but it is easy to test. 
I'll check it out this weekend.
--Brent
--- "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the response, Brent.  I believe that what
> you say is correct.
> However, I am trying to determine if there is truly
> a difference between
> preventing dense mode (dm-fallback), and, prevent
> the formation of the
> SPT (no ip pim spt-threshold infinity).  Are we
> really effectively doing
> the same thing, but in a different way?  Hmmmmm.
> 
> 
> Dave Schulz, 
> Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brent Foster [mailto:jbrentfoster@yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:50 PM
> To: Schulz, Dave; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: ip pim spt-threshold
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Not the same thing.  "no ip pim dm-fallback" simply
> prevents a router that has been configured with
> sparse-dense-mode from ever going to dense mode
> (i.e.
> flood & prune behavior).
> 
> This has no effect on the sparse-mode SPT process,
> at
> least that is my understanding.
> 
> --- "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
> 
> > Group -
> > 
> > When using the spt-threshold command....the
> > "infinity" option keeps the
> > leaf router from building a shortest path tree to
> > the source.  So, could
> > the same thing be also accomplished with the "no
> ip
> > pim dm-fallback"
> > option, which would prevent the specific group or
> > client on the leaf
> > router from running in dense mode and continuing
> to
> > pull from the RP?
> > 
> > 
> > Dave Schulz,
> > Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
> > <mailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com >
> > 
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3