From: Mushtaq A. Khan (mak.ccie2b@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 26 2006 - 09:34:01 GMT-3
I am aware of this but as I mentioned earlier what if you are bound to use
only mac then it is kind of limitation of VRRP as there is no option to
use-bia or may be I'm unable to find any other option.
Mushtaq
On 3/26/06, Schulz, Dave <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
>
>  This shouldn't be an issue as I detailed at the beginning of this
> thread.  Set the max addresses to 2, then hard-code them, right?
>
> Dave Schulz
> *** Sent from my Blackberry ***
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mushtaq A. Khan <mak.ccie2b@gmail.com>
> To: xprtofnet <xprtofnet@yahoo.com>
> CC: Schulz, Dave <DSchulz@dpsciences.com>; ccielab@groupstudy.com <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sun Mar 26 00:00:50 2006
> Subject: Re: Port-security with HSRP
>
> The problem here is that you are bound to use only one mac so no matter
> what mac address you use, the port security violation will occur as the
> switch detects the second mac (virutal mac add) generated by VRRP.
>
> Mushtaq
>
>
> On 3/25/06, xprtofnet <xprtofnet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>         did you try different mac-addresses on the two routers
>         ? it should work...!
>
>         --- "Mushtaq A. Khan" < mak.ccie2b@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>         > All,
>         > I was thinking another scenario where we are bound
>         > to use VRRP and allow
>         > only one mac-address on the switch. What we do that
>         > in that case as I
>         > couldn't find an option to use-bia in VRRP. I tried
>         > to make it work by hard
>         > coding the virtual-mac generated by VRRP to the
>         > router but it didn't work.
>         > Is there any other option?
>         >
>         > Mushtaq
>         >
>         > On 3/25/06, xprtofnet <xprtofnet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>         > >
>         > > keep in mind that port security will complain
>         > about
>         > > duplicate mac if hsrp uses same virtual-mac. so
>         > better
>         > > to hard-code the virtual-mac for hsrp or use bia
>         > so
>         > > that it is not same.
>         > >
>         > > m2c.
>         > >
>         > > --- "Schulz, Dave" <DSchulz@dpsciences.com> wrote:
>         > >
>         > > > I was working through some different solutions
>         > with
>         > > > port-security with
>         > > > HSRP.  If there is a requirement to lockdown a
>         > > > specific port connected
>         > > > to a router that is running HSRP, I see two
>         > > > different solutions.
>         > > >
>         > > > First one being, to put the command "standby
>         > > > use-bia" and force the
>         > > > router to use the bia (or configured mac for the
>         > > > virtual ip).  Or, we
>         > > > can also use the following (adding a second mac
>         > to
>         > > > the switchport
>         > > > config).  As below....
>         > > >
>         > > > Current configuration : 304 bytes
>         > > > !
>         > > > interface FastEthernet0/1
>         > > >  switchport access vlan 10
>         > > >  switchport mode access
>         > > >  switchport port-security
>         > > >  switchport port-security maximum 2
>         > > >  switchport port-security mac-address sticky
>         > > >  switchport port-security mac-address
>         > 0000.0c07.ac01
>         > > >    <- router
>         > > > mac-address
>         > > >  switchport port-security mac-address sticky
>         > > > 0008.a3fc.a661   <-virtual
>         > > > mac-address assigned by HSRP
>         > > > end
>         > > >
>         > > > Any reason why each of these would not be valid?
>         > > >
>         > > > Also, it appears that we can statically
>         > configure
>         > > > the mac, or, use the
>         > > > sticky (and save the config)....depending on the
>         > > > requirements.
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > Dave Schulz
>         > > >
>         > > > Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
>         > > > <
> mailto: dschulz@dpsciences.com >  >
>
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > >
>         >
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>         > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>         > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>         > > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > > __________________________________________________
>         > > Do You Yahoo!?
>         > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>         > protection around
>         > > http://mail.yahoo.com
>         > >
>         > >
>         >
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>         > > Subscription information may be found at:
>         > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html <
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>
>         > >
>         >
>
>
>         __________________________________________________
>         Do You Yahoo!?
>         Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>         http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com>
>
>
>
> <+dschulz@dpsciences.com+%3Cmailto:dschulz@dpsciences.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3