From: xprtofnet (xprtofnet@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Apr 08 2006 - 22:03:25 GMT-3
try adding the process id for ospf
--- Nick Griffin <ngriffin@sio.midco.net> wrote:
> If your running multiple ospf processes, should you
> get output from a
> "sh ip route ospf" if you have routes in both
> processes, I'm not?
>
> Rack1SW2#sh run | begin router
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute ospf 2 subnets
> passive-interface default
> no passive-interface FastEthernet0/5
> network 137.1.58.8 0.0.0.0 area 58
> !
> router ospf 2
> log-adjacency-changes
> redistribute ospf 1 subnets
> passive-interface default
> no passive-interface Vlan28
> network 137.1.28.8 0.0.0.0 area 0
>
> Rack1SW2#sh ip route ospf
>
> Rack1SW2#
>
> Rack1SW2#sh ip route
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> 137.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 5 subnets
> O E2 137.1.12.0 [110/64] via 137.1.28.2,
> 00:03:07, Vlan28
> O E2 137.1.15.0 [110/128] via 137.1.28.2,
> 00:03:07, Vlan28
> O E2 137.1.25.0 [110/64] via 137.1.28.2,
> 00:03:07, Vlan28
> C 137.1.28.0 is directly connected, Vlan28
> C 137.1.58.0 is directly connected,
> FastEthernet0/5
> 150.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
> O E2 150.1.2.0 [110/1] via 137.1.28.2, 00:03:07,
> Vlan28
> C 150.1.8.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3