From: Alexei Monastyrnyi (alexeim@orcsoftware.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 09:09:28 GMT-3
ip rtp priority
is better way
A.
----- Original Message -----
From: "PANDI MOORTHY" <moorthypandi@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:50 AM
Subject: Class map for VOIP traffic
> The question is to put the VOIP traffic into the "priority queuing" (The
> current problem is poor voice quality)
>
>
>
> My confusion is in matching the VOIP packet.
>
>
>
> Can I just match the UDP packet " 16384 32767" , will it sufficient.
>
>
>
> ip access-list extended
>
> permit udp any any range 16384 32767
>
>
>
>
>
> Do I need match the TCP 1720 also?
>
>
>
> ip access-list extended VoIP
>
> permit tcp any any eq 1720
>
> permit udp any any range 16384 32767
>
>
>
>
>
> Because in Internetwork solution guide, for some scenario they just match
> only UDP port and for some they match both of them.
>
>
> Please advice me.
>
> Regards.
> Pandi
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3