From: Mike O (mikeeo@email.msn.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 11:15:55 GMT-3
If I'm not mistaken when you use an interface as the next hop on ethernet it
proxy arp's for the next hop which isn't really a good idea. I think this
was touched on a few months ago.
----- Original Message -----
From: "xprtofnet" <xprtofnet@yahoo.com>
To: "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>; "ccielab"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: Difference between ip route 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> with frame/atm use the next-hop addrs while with
> ethernet/broadcast media you can use the interface.
>
> if you use the interface with nbma media it will not
> know which dlci/vc to put the packet on thats why you
> should use the next-addrs
>
> m2c
>
> --- Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Group,
>>
>> What is the difference between
>>
>> IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 Vs. ip route
>> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
>>
>>
>> Both does the same job. Just wondering if anybody
>> can quickly explain the
>> application or scenario for both commands.
>>
>> means Serial 0/0 Vs next hop id (192.168.1.2) ??
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> FROG
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3