From: Anderson Mota Alves (mota_anderson@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon May 01 2006 - 22:47:01 ART
We are doing mutual redistribution but from the solution 4.8 we had to
advertise the loopback of the routers using the command:
router ospf 1
redistribute connected subnets route-map CONNECTED_TO_OSPF
match interface loopback 0
and the point is that R2 was not receiving the network 204.12.1.0/24 from
R6 since it's a directly connected route so since R2 is the point which
ends the RIP and starts OSPF how to tell to R1 (which is running OSPF)
about the network 204.12.1.0/24 ?
The only way I found was to include the interface fa0/0 (204.12.1.2) in
the match interface loopback fa0/0, after that R1 start receiving the
routes and BGP routes worked.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Magmax" <magmax@bigpond.net.au>
To: "'Anderson Mota Alves'"
<mota_anderson@hotmail.com>,<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: Lab 7 - IEWB (Redistribution) task 4.8 and 4.9
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:39:04 +1000
>In the lab diagram R2, R6, BB1, BB3 are running RIP v2 and there is
OSPF
>area 2 between R1 and R2
>
>I believe in IGP section we are doing mutual redistribution between
RIP and
>OSPF on R2 which should make 204.12.1.0/24 subnet reachable from
others
>routers
>
>
>Ubaid
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
>Anderson Mota Alves
>Sent: Tuesday, 2 May 2006 11:18 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Lab 7 - IEWB (Redistribution) task 4.8 and 4.9
>
>Hi Brians, I don't know if I'm wrong on this but I was having
problems in
>BGP in this lab because R1 was not seeing the bgp routes as best
from R2
>when I was issuing "show ip bgp" after some time I was able to
figure it
>out that the R2 was sending the bgp routes to R1 (iBGP) with a
next-hop
>of R6 (204.12.1.6) and then I realized that R1 didn't have the route
of
>204.12.1.0/24 installed on his route table so I had to go to R2 and
>change one requirement from 4.8 (change the route-map
CONNECTED_TO_OSPF
>permit 10 matching not only the loopback but also the interface
fa0/0 of
>R2 (which is 204.12.1.2) only after this R1 start receiving the
>204.12.1.0 routes from R2 and the BGP worked just fine. Please let
me
>know if I'm right or if I may be missing something here. Thanks,Andy
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:20 ART