From: CCIEin2006 (ciscocciein2006@gmail.com)
Date: Mon May 15 2006 - 11:07:42 ART
Thanks for your response.
If I expand my diagram a little:
2.2.2.0--(R1)--Area1--(R2)--Area0--(R3)--Area1---(R4)
Let say you have 2.2.2.0 advertised by R1, will R4 simply see it as a LSA
type 3 summary or will it see it as an intra-area route?
My guess is it will see it as any other type 3 summary and has no knowledge
of the other Area1.
On 5/15/06, Bajo <bajoalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Area 0 does not see them discontiguousand and has no problem with it.
> labbed it up too. The routes from R2 and R3 show up as internal to each
> other.
>
> On 5/15/06, CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In the following scenario you can see Area1 is discontiguous:
>
> (R1)--Area1--(R2)--Area0--(R3)--Area1---(R4)
>
> Does Area0 view these as two separate areas? What kind of problems will
> occur?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
>
> Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART