RE: WRR question

From: Anderson Mota Alves (mota_anderson@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 09 2006 - 02:41:41 ART


Hi,

Your configuration doesn't seem to be correct to me, because with the
command

wrr-queue cos-map 1 1 5 3 4 (you are mapping the Scavenger 1 to Queue 1
and also Voice traffic (5) and Cos 3 and 4 all of then to Queue 1.

And then with the command wrr-queue threshold 1 60 100 you are telling
the router that you want to change the default threshold 1 and 2 from
 100 % the default for queue 1 to 60 and 100 percentage, so when the
first threshold exceed 60% it will start counting to threshold 1 of queue
1.

and with the command wrr-queue bandwidth 25 50 50 1 you are giving 25 %
of bandwidth to queue 1, 50 to queue 2, 50 to queue 3 and the queue 4 is
PQ since you put 1 in the config, I would configure something like this.

wrr-queue bandwidth 25 50 50 1 (assigns 25% for Q1, 50% to Q2, 50% to Q3
and 4 as PQ)
wrr-queue threshold 1 60 100 (assigns 60% of threshold 1 and 100% of
threshold 2 of queue 1)

wrr-queue threshold 2 80 100 ( assigns 80% of threshold 1 and 100% of
threshold 2 of queue 2)

wrr-queue cos-map 1 1 (assigns scavenger traffic to queue 1)

wrr-queue cos-map 2 0 (assigns best effort to Q2)

wrr-queue cos-map 3 2 3 4 6 7 (Assigns Cos 2,3,4,6,7 to Q3)

wrr-queue cos-map 4 5 (Assigns VoIP to Q4 PQ)

priority-queue out (Enables Q4 as PQ)

Regards,

Andy

  --------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)" <fzabihi@cisco.com>
  Reply-To: "Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)" <fzabihi@cisco.com>
  To: "Rick Fox" <rick.fox@tcsny.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
  Subject: RE: WRR question
  Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:31:19 -0400
>Did you use to play for the lakers?
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: Rick Fox [mailto:rick.fox@tcsny.com]
>Sent: Thu Jun 08 22:19:26 2006
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: WRR question
>
>Given the example below:
>
>wrr-queue bandwidth 25 50 50 1
>wrr-queue threshold 1 60 100
>wrr-queue cos-map 1 1 5 3 4
>
>In the above cos-map statement, does this mean that queue 1 will
  have
>60% of the bandwidth of that queue, and 5, 3, and 4 will have 100%
  of
>the remaining 40%?
>
>Thanks,
>Rick
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART