From: Pierre-Alex (paguanel@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 10 2006 - 09:07:50 ART
Dear Petr,
You wrote an excellent methodology (which I am using to prepare for the
lab ).
http://www.ksu.ru/petr/CCIE-RS-Checklist-draft-part-1-v2.txt
Just in case you would have written point 4) and 5) can you provide an URL
?
4) Implement & Troubleshoot your plan.
5) Verify your solutionThanks and regards,Pierre-AlexAlso out of curiosity,
were you able to get your number using this method ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Lapukhov" <petrsoft@gmail.com>
To: "rocco r21" <roccor21@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: diff between ip verify unicast-rpf and " " " reachable-via ?
> Okay, now
>
> "ip verify unicast reverse-path" is an "old" format of uRPF command.
> It is functionally equivalent to more recent "ip verify unicast source
> reachable-via rx"
>
> "ip verify unicast source reachable-via any" defines uRPF "loose"
> mode, which requires that source ip should be reachable via any
> router's inteface, not the "rx"-one.
>
> HTH
> Petr
>
> 2006/6/10, rocco r21 <roccor21@hotmail.com>:
>>
>> ip verify unicast reachable-via according to cisco prevents spoofing. How
>> does this differ from ip verify unicast reverse-path? CCO is a bit vauge
>> on this.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/359 - Release Date: 6/8/2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:32 ART