From: Kay D (krsna83@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jun 19 2006 - 06:16:31 ART
Thanks Fred you are right .It worked .
On 6/19/06, Frederick Chan <fchanwh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is how the cisco doc said,
> "If preemption is enabled, the router with the highest priority becomes
> the
> designated active router. If priorities are equal, the primary IP
> addresses
> are compared, and the higher IP address has priority"
>
> Can you reassign the a higher IP addr to R1?
>
> 2006/6/19, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor preempt on
> neither
> > routers .
> > Any other way out ????
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/06, Shanky <shankyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher priority....without
> > using
> > > the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other router on
> the
> > > segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1's priority
> higher
> > > without using the command on R1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope it helps
> > >
> > > Shanky
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/19/06, Kay D <krsna83@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router without using
> > > standy priority or preempt .
> > >
> > > Thanks ,
> > > Kay D
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Fred
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART