From: Hoogen (hoogen82@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2006 - 02:43:30 ART
Typos or no typos. If you don't understand something or you are doubtfull,
just ask the proctor. I use to bug the proctor literally. It was something
like for every three questions the lab asked me i asked the proctor a
question.
I think those guys are there to help you out. They are more expierenced than
most of us who take the lab.
So go ahead bug them, after all your paying 1250$ for those 8 hours.
Regards
Hoogen.
On 6/20/06, Julius Kinsler <jkinsler@harbortech.com> wrote:
>
> Ive seen typos as well that I've lost time on, I wonder now if that's
> actually part of the lab and its on purpose. Where they want you to
> engage the proctor..
>
> Julius
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Roberto Fernandez
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:49 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Talking about typos on the exam questionnaire
>
> Friends,
>
> On my second attempt (failed) I faced one typo, it took me some time
> (not an hour) to go to the proctor and confirm. It was not spelling or
> grammar; it was like an addition of a number on a command output where
> it couldn't possible be. But being the CCIE Lab, you always trust more
> on the test than in yourself...this time I was right, but it cost me
> some time. (Anyway those 15 or 30 minutes wouldn't have make any
> difference)
>
> Best Regards,
> Roberto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Godswill Oletu
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:32 PM
> To: dfredrick@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Still waiting on Results from Friday
>
> Rick,
>
> I can feel you men, hang in there.
>
> Lets be serious, without breaking the NDA, can you share more light on
> the kind of typos? It is forgiving if the typos are spelling errors, or
> some
>
> grammer related terms that will not affect one's understanding or
> solution.
>
> However, if the typos will influence how someone intepretes or approach
> a particular task, then it will be highly unfair and Cisco should have
> caught it before releasing the lab to their centre.
>
> Thanks.
> Godswill Oletu
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <dfredrick@gmail.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:04 PM
> Subject: Still waiting on Results from Friday
>
>
> > Man... it's 2pm... and still no results... What the longest someone
> has
> > had to wait for the results. You think's because I had two typos? And
> > since it took me an hour to convince the proctor that they were
> typos...
> > it's taking them a bit to figure out their mistakes?
> >
> > Do you think that this should be grounds for a refund... (the typos)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART