On NAT, extended v/s overload

From: Roberto Fernandez (rofernandez@us.telefonica.com)
Date: Mon Jun 26 2006 - 20:49:11 ART

• Next message: Navin MS: "Re: Policing - what happens to violate packets?"
• Previous message: Kay D: "CBWFQ Mark In/Out Confused"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Friends,

I need some help understanding the difference between the "exteneded"
and "overload" keywords at the end of a "ip nat" translation rule.

The DOC it is not very clear... so please someone correct me if I'm
wrong

1- I'd use "overload" on dynamic translations where the "inside local"
is unknown but we want many of them being able to use the same "inside
global"

2- I'd use "extended" on static translations where I want several known
"inside global" being able to be translated to the same "inside global"

Please correct me if I'm inaccurate and/or if more can be added.

Thanks for your time, as always
Roberto

• Next message: Navin MS: "Re: Policing - what happens to violate packets?"
• Previous message: Kay D: "CBWFQ Mark In/Out Confused"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:33 ART