Lab re-read

From: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com
Date: Fri Jun 30 2006 - 09:29:09 ART

• Next message: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: RIP summarization"
• Previous message: Curt Gregg \(cugregg\): "RE: Frame-Relay Static mapping couple Qs"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Koen Zeilstra: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Hyunseog Ryu: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Daniel Fredrick: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Lileikis, Gary: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Elias Chari: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Mike O: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Just wanting opinions if anyone thinks it's possible to get as much as 6
points back on a re-read

And by this I mean I failed my third attempt yesterday

• Next message: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: RIP summarization"
• Previous message: Curt Gregg \(cugregg\): "RE: Frame-Relay Static mapping couple Qs"
• Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Koen Zeilstra: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Hyunseog Ryu: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Daniel Fredrick: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Lileikis, Gary: "RE: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Elias Chari: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Maybe reply: Mike O: "Re: Lab re-read"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 07:57:34 ART