From: Stavros Filargyropoulos (f.stavros@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2006 - 14:08:46 ART
Hi Ivan,
I do not think so, I'm not 100% sure about ip pim sparse-mode only, one of
the requirements says that there are multicast groups that the RP does not
covers
Say
224.0.0.10, 224.0.0.20, 224.0.0.30
Rx would be the Rp for .20 and .10
On 7/19/06, Osmanov, Orhan <Orhan.Osmanov@siemens.com> wrote:
>
>
> Why don't use ip pim sparse-mode and ip pim auto-rp listener ?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Orhan Osmanov
>
> Senior System Engineer
>
> Mobile: +359 888 585630
>
> E-mail: orhan.osmanov@siemens.com
>
> SIEMENS EOOD
>
> Bulgaria, Sofia 1309, 2 "Kukush"str.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ivan
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 1:24 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Stavros Filargyropoulos
> Subject: Re: Multicast
>
> Once task restrict using dense mode, you can't using ip pim
> sparce-dense-mode.
> Instead AutoRP need use BSR. As for RP spoofing, think that ip pim
> bsr-border
> must be used at border routers.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > if a task tells you to configure so that RP spoofing should not
> happen; and
> > one restriction tells that ip pim dense is not allowed but they are
> > multicast groups that the RP does not covers, could I use ip pim
> > sparse-dense-mode and ip pim rp-announce-filter announcements at the
> > mapping agent?
> >
> > tia
> > *Stav.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> Ivan
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 07:13:48 ART