QoS - Marking - Policing

From: Udo Konstantin (ccie_groupstudy@yahoo.de)
Date: Tue Aug 15 2006 - 02:02:16 ART

• Next message: Bizzell, Keith: "Can't form OSPF virtual link"
• Previous message: postmaster@traknet.com: "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)"
• Next in thread: Radoslav Vasilev: "Re: QoS - Marking - Policing"
• Maybe reply: Radoslav Vasilev: "Re: QoS - Marking - Policing"
• Maybe reply: csica: "RE: QoS - Marking - Policing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi group,

I had the challenge on a given interface to mark traffic up to 128 k
with precedence 3 and above with 1. I shouldn't use rate-limit.

Also on a given fastethernet IF I should mark all traffic coming with
precedence x and/or coming from VLANA -> VLANB guarantee a minimum
bandwidth of 128k. In case of congestion drop randomly (?!?!?) ->
WRED ??!?!
Traffic with precedence 4 limit to 128k

any help for me ??

udo

• Next message: Bizzell, Keith: "Can't form OSPF virtual link"
• Previous message: postmaster@traknet.com: "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)"
• Next in thread: Radoslav Vasilev: "Re: QoS - Marking - Policing"
• Maybe reply: Radoslav Vasilev: "Re: QoS - Marking - Policing"
• Maybe reply: csica: "RE: QoS - Marking - Policing"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART