When to use frame traffic-shaping

From: Paul Dardinski (pauld@marshallcomm.com)
Date: Sun Aug 20 2006 - 14:06:58 ART

• Next message: Vikram Dadlaney: "Re: MPLS newbie w/ a couple basic Q's"
• Previous message: navaid99@yahoo.com: "Multicast RPF check"
• Next in thread: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: When to use frame traffic-shaping"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: When to use frame traffic-shaping"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I seem to find contradictory info on cco regarding this point. Obviously
frame traffic-shape and mqc traffic shape are mutually exclusive. Yet,
seems as though whenever mqc service policy is applied to map-class for
pvc or subint application, frame traffic-shape is on some examples, not
on others.

Is this checklist correct:

MQC on physical frame int:

- service-policy direct on int, no frame traffic-shape

MQC in map-class:

- service policy applied to map-class, but NO frame
traffic-shape on physical int required?

FRTS - physical or subint

- obviously apply frame traffic-shape to physical int

I

Finally, if using "shape adaptive" in mqc, does it make difference as
reqards application of frame traffic-shaping?

Thanks for any help,

PD

• Next message: Vikram Dadlaney: "Re: MPLS newbie w/ a couple basic Q's"
• Previous message: navaid99@yahoo.com: "Multicast RPF check"
• Next in thread: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: When to use frame traffic-shaping"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: When to use frame traffic-shaping"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 15:41:57 ART