From: Niche (jackyliu419@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 03 2006 - 05:26:19 ART
Hi guys,
Two sites are being connected via GRE tunnel, and using OSPF for
routing information exchange.
Requirement - QoS for traffic control but many of you may already know
there are not much QoS can do to the GRE tunnel. So I used
"qos-preclassify" command on the tunnel interface and configure
appropriate QoS configuration in the service policy for the physical
interfaces at both sites. The matching method is simple access-group
with protocol type and ip addresses, and here come the odd...
When I check the hit count of the ACLs that are being used by the
service policy, the number is zero. I am sure there are matching
traffic types passing throught the interface, so it make me wonder
what's wrong.
Ok, according to Cisco web information, only term "physical interface"
is mentioned in the article. So, how about logical interface? e.g.
multilink interface, FR sub-interface..etc. I confess that the service
policies for both of sites are being bound on logical interfaces
instead of physical one.
Cheers~
Jacky
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:39 ART