From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Wed Sep 20 2006 - 10:37:42 ART
Transmission can be considered from the devices attached (incoming) or from
the switch itself (outgoing).
The 3550 will not correctly support multi-port sharing of aggregate
policers, but the 3560 will. The lab got a little ancy in preparing for the
3560 deployments!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Chee
Chew Leong
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 2:33 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ipexpert q17.4 (aggregate-policer)
It asks to configure such that VLAN12 (all ports) do not exceed 2 Mbps
transmission speed.
The solution given is something like this.
mls qos aggregate-policer 2mPolicy 2000000 375000 exceed drop policy-map p1
class class-default police aggregate 2mPolicy
int f0/1
service-policy input p1
int f0/2
service-policy input p1
I dont feel this is the correct way of doing with aggregate-policer. I have
2 questions on the solution.
1) aggregate-policer is for combining traffic from different classes into
single policer. But here, it is using for different physical interface which
should not work.
2) it mentions 'transmission speed', would it be the service-policy should
apply to the output direction.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 16:55:41 ART