From: Swaroop Potdar (swarooppotdar@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 21:08:26 ART
Yes, this is possible, and generally is the case when you do protection
starting at the PE's.
Or else also in some typical topologies in the core as well.
As end of the day, FRR works because of the global label allocation, ans
this shouldnt differ if you Head-End and Protection start at the same
device.
Try using explict paths for both your primary and backup tunnel. should be
good to go.
Cheers,
Swaroop.
>From: "Jesse Loggins CCIE#14661" <jlogginsccie@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Jesse Loggins CCIE#14661" <jlogginsccie@gmail.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: OT-MPLS FRR
>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 12:48:19 -0700
>
>Does anyone know when using MPLS-TE FRR if the tunnel head end and the
>point
>of local repair can reside on the same device? I have a situation where I
>am
>trying to protect a tunnel from an link failure but the tunnel head end and
>link bot reside on the same device, and although FRR says it is protecting
>the
>tunnel. I get a re-route path verification failed, yet the FRR tunnel is
>pre-existing via a path that avoids the protected link.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:05 ART