Feasible successor

From: haducbinh (haducbinh@vnpro.org)
Date: Sat Oct 28 2006 - 08:27:38 ART

Next message: Edouard Zorrilla: "Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack---THE BRIANS AND SCOTT"
Previous message: Ubaid Iftikhar \(AU\): "RE: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack---THE BRIANS AND SCOTT"
Next in thread: Jung-I Lin: "Re: Feasible successor"
Maybe reply: Jung-I Lin: "Re: Feasible successor"
Maybe reply: haducbinh: "RE: Feasible successor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi GS!

I read this line: "A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is
less than the feasible distance (current best path)" in this URL:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094c
b7.shtml#feasibleandreported

But in BSCI 3.0 it said that: "A feasible successor is a path whose reported
distance is less than or equal the feasible distance (current best path)"

It make me confuse so much! Please show me, what is right and what is
wrong???

Thanks!

HaDucBinh
Mail: <mailto:haducbinh@vnpro.org> haducbinh@vnpro.org or
<mailto:haducbinh@yahoo.com> haducbinh@yahoo.com
Phone: +84 908 191 322
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro)
Cisco Authorised Training
149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314
Fax: (08) 5124314
Website: <http://vnpro.vn> http://vnpro.vn
Support Forum: <http://vnpro.org> http://vnpro.org

Next message: Edouard Zorrilla: "Re: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack---THE BRIANS AND SCOTT"
Previous message: Ubaid Iftikhar \(AU\): "RE: ICMP Flooding vs SMURF Attack---THE BRIANS AND SCOTT"
Next in thread: Jung-I Lin: "Re: Feasible successor"
Maybe reply: Jung-I Lin: "Re: Feasible successor"
Maybe reply: haducbinh: "RE: Feasible successor"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 01 2006 - 07:29:07 ART