From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2006 - 09:22:09 ART
Tim,
The difference is per-VC queueing. When FRTS is not enabled all
circuits on the interface and all subinterfaces share the same output
queue. This means that you cannot configure different service policies
on a per-VC basis. With FRTS enabled the router creates per-VC shaping
queues and different policies can be applied on a per-VC basis.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP)
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> timbuktu
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 11:01 PM
> To: ccielab
> Subject: policy maps & frame-relay traffic-shaping
>
> Hi all,
>
> When applying a policy map on an interface configured for frame-relay,
is
> it
> required that it then be applied in a map-class and enable frame-relay
> traffic-shaping? Or can it just be applied to the interface?
>
> For example, this is a policy map applied to a map-class, which is
then
> applied as FRTS.
>
> policy-map STUFF
> class class-default
> bandwidth percent 50
> !
> map-class FRTS
> service-policy output STUFF
> !
> interface serial0/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay class FRTS
>
> But what if I just do this? Apply the policy map directly on the
> interface
> without using FRTS.
>
> policy-map STUFF
> class class-default
> bandwidth percent 60
> !
> interface serial0/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> service-policy output STUFF
>
> Will I get different results?
> Please advise....
> -tim
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 01 2006 - 08:05:45 ART